Wilson v. . Featherstone
27 S.E. 121 | N.C. | 1897
There are two reasons why an injunction should not have been granted in this case:
1. No written undertaking was written or tendered as required. The Code, sec. 341; Miller v. Parker,
2. There is no allegation of defendants' insolvency; on the contrary, the plaintiff's affidavit admits that the defendants "are wealthy and amply able to respond in damages for any wrong done this affiant." Hettrick v.Page,
Reversed.
Cited: Rope Co. v. Aluminum Co.,
(451)