History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wilson-Davis & Co., Inc. v. Mirgliotta
1:16-cv-03056
N.D. Ohio
Jan 12, 2017
Check Treatment
Docket

*1 Case: 1:16-cv-03056-PAG Doc #: 19 Filed: 01/12/17 1 of 2. PageID #: 80

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Wilson-Davis & Co., Inc., ) CASE NO. 1:16 CV 3056

) Plaintiff, ) JUDGE PATRICIA A. GAUGHAN ) Vs. ) ) James Mirgliotta, et al, ) Memorandum of Opinion and Order )

Defendants. ) This case is before the Court upon Plaintiff Wilson-Davis & Co., Inc.’s Motion for Expedited Discovery in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 7). Plaintiff’s motion is denied at this time. Defendants have indicated that they intend to file a motion to dismiss. To allow the Court to rule on the motion to dismiss as expeditiously as possible, Plaintiff’s brief in opposition will be due fourteen days after the motion is filed, and Defendants’ reply will be due seven days thereafter. The Court will rule promptly on the motion. If it is denied, the Court will entertain another motion for expedited discovery and will set a briefing schedule for Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction. The Court understands that Plaintiff may have to file the Submission Agreement with FINRA prior to a ruling on the motion to

1 *2 Case: 1:16-cv-03056-PAG Doc #: 19 Filed: 01/12/17 2 of 2. PageID #: 81 dismiss; however, the arbitration itself is not scheduled until considerably later in the year.

IT IS SO ORDERED .

/s/ Patricia A. Gaughan PATRICIA A. GAUGHAN Dated: 1/12/17 United States District Judge

2

Case Details

Case Name: Wilson-Davis & Co., Inc. v. Mirgliotta
Court Name: District Court, N.D. Ohio
Date Published: Jan 12, 2017
Docket Number: 1:16-cv-03056
Court Abbreviation: N.D. Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.