History
  • No items yet
midpage
Willson & Adams Co. v. Pearce
218 A.D. 865
N.Y. App. Div.
1926
Check Treatment

Judgment reversed upon the law and the facts, and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that the findings of fact are of such an inconsistent character that we are unable to uphold the judgment in the present state of the record; and we think that in the interests of justice there should be a new trial, at which it may be determined by the trial court whether or not the primary purpose of the defendants was unlawful, and with the object of injuring or destroying plaintiffs’ business. Kelly, P. J., Jaycox, Manning, Kapper and Lazansky, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Willson & Adams Co. v. Pearce
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Dec 15, 1926
Citation: 218 A.D. 865
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.