History
  • No items yet
midpage
Willoughby v. Holderness
62 N.H. 661
N.H.
1883
Check Treatment

The plaintiff cannot recover. William Gale had no authority to surrender the Lee note and take a note payable to himself. There is a total failure of consideration. A judgment in this suit would not bind Lee's administrator, if one should be appointed, nor prevent his recovery upon the original note. When an administrator of Lee's estate is appointed, he may be made plaintiff instead of Willoughby. Hazen v. Quimby, 61 N.H. 76; Buckminster v. Wright, 59 N.H. 153; Boudreau v. Eastman, 59 N.H. 467; Chauncy v. Ins. Co., 60 N.H. 428.

Case discharged.

ALLEN J., did not sit: the others concurred.

An administrator upon the estate of Lee was subsequently appointed, who came in, and was substituted for Willoughby as plaintiff, and, on a count for money had and received, judgment was rendered against the defendants for the amount due on the Lee note. *Page 663

Case Details

Case Name: Willoughby v. Holderness
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Jun 5, 1883
Citation: 62 N.H. 661
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.