Willis v. State, 640 So. 2d 1188

PER CURIAM.

Willis contends that the trial court erred in imposing conditions of probation in the written judgment and sentence which were not orally pronounced at sentencing. We reverse the sentence and remand for resolution of the discrepancy. See Cleveland v. State, 617 So.2d 1166 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DAUKSCH, PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Willis v. State

Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida

Date Published: Jul 29, 1994

Citations: 640 So. 2d 1188; 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7515; 1994 WL 391046; No. 93-1970

Docket Number: No. 93-1970

Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.