Willis v. City of New YorkWillis v. City of New York
The parties’ remaining contentions either are without merit or have been rendered academic in light of our determination.
Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have denied those branches of the respondents’ separate cross motions which were to dismiss the action pursuant to
Since the Supreme Court did not consider the merits of that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion which was to compel the defendants Diana Sull, “Jane” Sull, City of New York, New York City Department of Education, Richard Dodici, and “Jane” Abraham to appear for depositions and complete all outstanding discovery, the matter must be remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for a determination on the merits of that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion. Mastro, J.P., Roman, Miller and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.