History
  • No items yet
midpage
Willie Pennix v. Sgt Standford
692 F. App'x 689
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willie Pennix, Appellant Pro Se. Ankush Nayar, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Willie Pennix appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pennix v. Standford , No. 1:16-cv-01643-RDB (D. Md. Feb. 16, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Willie Pennix v. Sgt Standford
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Jun 27, 2017
Citation: 692 F. App'x 689
Docket Number: 17-6259
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.