170 N.W.2d 850 | Mich. Ct. App. | 1969
WILLIAMS
v.
WILLIAMS.
Michigan Court of Appeals.
Ashley Gorman, for plaintiff.
Calvin C. Rock (Norman L. Zemke of counsel), for defendant.
Before: FITZGERALD, P.J., and LEVIN and T.M. BURNS, JJ.
*306 PER CURIAM.
This appeal arises from an order of the Macomb county circuit court dated December 5, 1967, modifying an earlier judgment of divorce. Joseph L. Williams, plaintiff, filed suit for divorce in the Macomb circuit court on September 24, 1965, and on October 5, 1965, the complaint was answered by defendant Vivian E. Williams. A cross-bill was subsequently filed by defendant in January of 1966.
It appears from the record that the parties were married July 2, 1955 and separated in 1965. The children of the marriage are Richard J. Williams, born November 13, 1956; Ronald L. Williams, born April 14, 1958; and Terry A. Williams, born April 27, 1965. Prior to the entry of the judgment of divorce, the parties had agreed on a property settlement and custody and support of the minor children. It was agreed that defendant should have custody of the three minor children.
On June 3, 1966, before judgment was entered, defendant removed the three children to the home of her parents in South Carolina without prior approval of the court. On July 11, 1966, an order was entered permitting the father to pick up the children from their mother's home and return them to Michigan for visitation of approximately two weeks. A judgment of divorce was finally entered on August 12, 1966, giving custody of the three children to defendant, but restricting her from permanently removing them from the State of Michigan without prior consent of the court. On December 5, 1967, the court modified the judgment of divorce and awarded custody of the two oldest children to the plaintiff, in agreement with a recommendation by the friend of the court.
We are asked to address ourselves to the question of whether the circuit court abused its discretion in modifying the judgment of divorce and removing *307 custody of the two oldest children, both under the age of twelve, from the mother and placing them in the custody of the father.
As both parties readily agree, the matter of primary importance in the case at bar is the best interests of the children involved. See Koeppen v. Koeppen (1968), 11 Mich. App. 147; In re Ernst (1964), 373 Mich. 337.
Considerable time has elapsed since the modification of the judgment and the change of custody. The record does not reflect the current circumstances with respect to the children and their parents. We think it would be undesirable for us to attempt to resolve the question of what custody order would be in the best interest of the children on the stale and inadequate record presented.
We therefore remand this case to the circuit court with instructions to conduct a hearing before a new trial court for the purpose of making further and complete findings of the current facts and for the entry of that custody order which in the court's judgment will be in the best interest of the children. It is further ordered that said hearing be conducted and the custody order entered if at all possible before August 15, 1969.[*]
Remanded. No costs.
NOTES
[*] Date chosen to permit decision before the opening of the school year.
