History
  • No items yet
midpage
34 Mo. 95
Mo.
1863
Bates, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

1. There was no error in permitting the defendants to file *98an affidavit and recognizance in the appellate court. (R. O. 1855, p. 973, § 7, and p. 975, § 17.) And after they were filed the motions to dismiss the appeal were properly overruled.

2. The instruction given for the defendants was palpably wrong. Even in a criminal case there must be a reasonable doubt to acquit the defendant, and the principle has no application to a civil case.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

Judges Bay and Dryden concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Williams v. Watson
Court Name: Supreme Court of Missouri
Date Published: Mar 15, 1863
Citation: 34 Mo. 95
Court Abbreviation: Mo.
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In
    Williams v. Watson, 34 Mo. 95