History
  • No items yet
midpage
Williams v. Watson
34 Mo. 95
Mo.
1863
Check Treatment
Bates, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

1. There was no error in permitting the defendants to file *98an affidavit and recognizance in the appellate court. (R. O. 1855, p. 973, § 7, and p. 975, § 17.) And after they were filed the motions to dismiss the appeal were properly overruled.

2. The instruction given for the defendants was palpably wrong. Even in a criminal case there must be a reasonable doubt to acquit the defendant, and the principle has no application to a civil case.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

Judges Bay and Dryden concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Williams v. Watson
Court Name: Supreme Court of Missouri
Date Published: Mar 15, 1863
Citation: 34 Mo. 95
Court Abbreviation: Mo.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.