History
  • No items yet
midpage
Williams v. . the City of New York
219 N.Y. 545
| NY | 1916
|
Check Treatment

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., COLLIN, CUDDEBACK, HOGAN and POUND, JJ. HISCOCK, J., dissents on the ground that it was error for the court to hold as matter of law that the city did not commit a breach of this contract by withholding payment on the certificates. *Page 546

Case Details

Case Name: Williams v. . the City of New York
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Oct 3, 1916
Citation: 219 N.Y. 545
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.