520 S.E.2d 466 | Ga. Ct. App. | 1999
Leslie Williams was indicted on charges of entering an automobile with intent to commit a theft and violation of OCGA § 16-11-131, which makes it a felony for any person on probation as a first offender, see OCGA §§ 42-8-60 through 42-8-65, or any person who has previously been convicted of a felony, to possess a firearm. OCGA § 16-11-131 (b). Following a bifurcated jury trial, Williams was found not guilty of entering an automobile but guilty of violating OCGA § 16-11-131. He filed a motion for new trial* which was denied, and he now appeals. Because we conclude that the evidence was insufficient to convict Williams, we agree with Williams that reversal is required.
Williams does not dispute the material facts of the incident underlying his prosecution. On the night of January 31, 1995, the victim discovered that his Jeep, which was parked in his driveway, had been broken into. He saw the headlights on, the driver’s door open, broken glass on the ground and inside the vehicle, and the steering column damaged. A short time later, police arrested Williams and two juveniles, after stopping the car Williams was driving. During an inventory search of Williams’s car, police discovered a Lorcin .380 semiautomatic pistol and an RG .22 caliber revolver inside the car.
Williams argues that insufficient evidence existed to convict him of violation of OCGA § 16-11-131. That statute provides in relevant part: “Any person who is on probation as a first offender pursuant to Article 3 of Chapter 8 of Title 42 or who has been convicted of a felony by a court of this state . . . and who receives, possesses, or transports any firearm commits a felony.” OCGA § 16-11-131 (b). Williams does not take issue with the finding inherent in the jury’s verdict that he possessed the guns found inside his car. He contends, however, that he was not “on probation as a first offender,” as required by OCGA § 16-11-131 (b). We agree.
The State did present evidence that Williams was convicted and sentenced as a first offender in 1992. Williams was subsequently convicted of another felony offense in 1993, however, and his first offender probation was revoked. Consequently, when he was arrested in 1995, he was no longer “on probation as a first offender.” OCGA § 16-11-131 (b). The evidence therefore was insufficient to convict Williams of violation of OCGA § 16-11-131 (b).
OCGA § 16-11-131 (b) also states that a convicted felon in possession of a firearm commits a felony, and Williams was a convicted felon at the time of his January 1995 arrest. But the indictment for the 1995 incident charged Williams with violation of OCGA § 16-11-
The State argues that the indictment charging Williams with violation of OCGA § 16-11-131 did not require proof that Williams was still on first offender probation in January 1995. Instead, according to the State, the indictment required only proof that Williams had previously been sentenced to a term of probation as a first offender.
Judgment reversed.
The indictment states in relevant part that Williams violated OCGA § 16-11-131 by possessing certain firearms, the “accused having been sentenced pursuant to Article 3 of Chapter 8 of Title 42 of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated to a term of probation as a First Offender” in January 1992.
