History
  • No items yet
midpage
Williams v. State
811 So. 2d 814
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
2002
Check Treatment
SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

Although the defendant claims otherwise, it is clear that his failure to make two required monthly reports to his probation officer justifies the revocation of probation under review. See Robinson v. State, 773 So.2d 566 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Butler v. State, 775 So.2d 320 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)1; *815Williams v. State, 728 So.2d 287 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); Jordan v. State, 610 So.2d 616 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). See Jess v. State, 384 So.2d 328, 329 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

Affirmed.

. It is not necessary in this’ case to express our view as to how the conflict between our siblings concerning the effect of the failure to submit a single report should be resolved. Compare Carter v. State, - So.2d - (Fla. 1st DCA Case no. 98-2881, opinion filed, April 30, 1999)[24 FLW D1063], review granted, 740 So.2d 528 (Fla.1999)(one missed report not enough to support revocation); and Butler v. State, 775 So.2d 320 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)(same) with Schwartz v. State, 719 So.2d 965 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)(one missed report enough); Strunk v. State, 728 So.2d 320 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999)(same). But see Jess v. State, 384 So.2d 328, 329 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

Case Details

Case Name: Williams v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Mar 20, 2002
Citation: 811 So. 2d 814
Docket Number: No. 3D01-2291
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.