History
  • No items yet
midpage
Williams v. State
468 So. 2d 102
Ala. Crim. App.
1985
Check Treatment

On original deliverance this court affirmed the conviction of appellant, Calvin Lynn Williams, without opinion. 453 So.2d 11. After this court denied his application for rehearing, 453 So.2d 11, he petitioned the Supreme Court of Alabama for a writ of certiorari, which was granted.

The Supreme Court of Alabama has determined that the State failed to present sufficient evidence to sustain the defendant's conviction. Williams v. State, 468 So.2d 99 (Ala. 1985). The Supreme Court held that this court erred in affirming the judgment of the trial court, and reversed and remanded the cause to this court with directions that this court enter an order consistent with its opinion. Williams v.State, supra.

Accordingly, the judgment of conviction heretofore entered by the trial court in this cause is due to be, and is hereby, reversed.

The United States Supreme Court has mandated that "the Double Jeopardy Clause precludes a second trial once a reviewing court has found the evidence legally insufficient," Burk v. UnitedStates, 437 U.S. 1, 98 S.Ct. 2141, 57 L.Ed.2d 1 (1978), and we find we have no choice but to reverse the decision of the lower court and render judgment in the defendant's favor. Martin v.State, 461 So.2d 1340 (Ala.Crim.App.), cert. denied,461 So.2d 1343 (Ala. 1984).

REVERSED AND RENDERED.

All Judges concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Williams v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Date Published: Mar 26, 1985
Citation: 468 So. 2d 102
Docket Number: 7 Div. 236
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.