Williams v. State, 462 So. 2d 577

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, charged with attempted first-degree murder, was found guilty of attempted second-degree murder. He claims that the trial court committed reversible error by declining to instruct the jury on the crime of attempted third-degree murder. We agree.

It is now well-settled that the crime of attempted third-degree murder exists in Florida. See State v. Overfelt, 457 So.2d 1385 (Fla.1984); Gentry v. State, 437 So.2d 1097 (Fla.1983). It is equally well-settled that “the failure to instruct on the next immediate lesser-included offense (one step removed) constitutes error that is per se reversible.” State v. Abreau, 363 So.2d 1063 (Fla.1978). Thus, the trial court’s refusal to instruct on attempted third-degree murder, the next immediate lesser-included offense to the crime of attempted second-degree murder, requires reversal of defendant’s conviction and sentence for the crime of attempted second-degree murder.

REVERSED and REMANDED for NEW TRIAL.

LETTS, HURLEY and DELL, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Williams v. State

Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida

Date Published: Jan 23, 1985

Citations: 462 So. 2d 577; 10 Fla. L. Weekly 233; 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12059; No. 83-1381

Docket Number: No. 83-1381

Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.