History
  • No items yet
midpage
Williams v. State
421 So. 2d 26
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1982
Check Treatment
MILLS, Judge.

Williams appeals the trial court’s summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

The first two issues raised by Williams were previously raised on direct appeal and cannot form the basis for collateral attack. Williams v. State, 386 So.2d 538 (Fla.1980). The third issue is without merit because newly discovered evidence may not be raised in a Rule 3.850 motion, but may only be raised by petition for writ of coram nobis *27to the appellate court which originally affirmed the conviction. Hallman v. State, 371 So.2d 482 (Fla.1979).

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Williams v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Oct 19, 1982
Citation: 421 So. 2d 26
Docket Number: No. AN-128
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.