History
  • No items yet
midpage
Williams v. State
349 So. 2d 800
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 1977
|
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of possessing a controlled substance with intent to deliver and delivering a controlled substance. Both crimes were charged under Section 893.-13(1)(a)1, Florida Statutes (1975). Both crimes occurred during a single episode in which the appellant delivered heroin to an undercover agent.

Appellant received a fifteen year sentence on count I and a five year concurrent sentence on count II. The sentence on count II must be set aside because both of the crimes were a facet of the same transaction. Orange v. State, 334 So.2d 277 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976). The state’s reliance upon Section 775.021(4), Florida Statutes (Supp. *8011976), is misplaced because this new statute only mandates separate sentencing where a person has committed an act in the course of one criminal transaction which constitutes a violation of two or more criminal statutes.

Appellant’s second point is without merit.

The judgments and the sentence on count I are affirmed. The sentence on count II is hereby set aside.

GRIMES, A. C. J., and SCHEB and OTT, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Williams v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Sep 7, 1977
Citation: 349 So. 2d 800
Docket Number: No. 77-248
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.