305 So. 2d 45 | Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 1974
CORRECTED OPINION
Appellant, defendant below, raises three points on this appeal from judgment of guilt and resulting sentence following a verdict by which a jury found him guilty of aggravated battery.
The record reveals that during the trial the trial judge repeatedly injected himself into the trial and on at least one instance took over the cross examination of a witness, taking the cross examination beyond the scope of the direct examination. Although we do not condone the action of the trial judge, being of the opinion that in the absence of unusual circumstances justice will best be accomplished in our adversary system of jurisprudence by leaving
Affirmed.