History
  • No items yet
midpage
Williams v. State
109 Ala. 64
Ala.
1895
Check Treatment
COLEMAN, J.

The exceptions reserved to the ruling of the court, in allowing the state to challenge the two jurors for cause, is without merit. Finch v. The State, 81 Ala. 41; Cr. Code, § 4331.

The voir dire examination of the witness Annie Bowls showed that she was competent to testify, and the court ruled correctly in so holding. Grimes v. State, 17 So. Rep. 189. The exception to the competency of the witness is the only one insisted upon in brief of counsel.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment of the tidal court must be affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Williams v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Nov 15, 1895
Citation: 109 Ala. 64
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.