History
  • No items yet
midpage
Williams v. State
23 Ga. App. 129
Ga. Ct. App.
1918
Check Treatment
Broyles, P. J.

1. The evidence submitted in behalf of the accused amply authorized the charge of the court upon voluntary manslaughter.

2. As presented by the 5th ground of the motion for a new trial, the ex elusion of the testimony set out therein -was not error.

3. Under the facts of the case the charge of the court upon the subject of flight was not error.

4. The verdict finding the accused gujlty of voluntary manslaughter was authorized by the evidence, and the court did not err in refusing to. grant a new tidal.

Judgment affirmed'.

Bloodworth, J., concurs. Stephens, J., not presiding. Orrin Roberts, for plaintiff in error. W. O. Dean, solicitor-general, contra.

Case Details

Case Name: Williams v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Dec 3, 1918
Citation: 23 Ga. App. 129
Docket Number: 9920
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.