History
  • No items yet
midpage
Williams v. State
52 S.E. 19
Ga.
1905
Check Treatment
Lumpkin, J.

There was sufficient evidence to authorize the verdict; and the presiding judge having refused a new trial, and no error of law being assigned, this court will not interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Williams v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Nov 8, 1905
Citation: 52 S.E. 19
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.