Williams v. State, 838 S.W.2d 25

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Richard A. Williams, appeals from the denial of his ‍‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌​‌‌​​​‍Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs and arguments of the parties, as well ‍‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌​‌‌​​​‍as the tran*26script and the legal file, and find no clear error in the findings of fact and conclusions of law ‍‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌​‌‌​​​‍of the trial court. In addition, we find that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We, therefore, ‍‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌​‌‌​​​‍affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been provided with a memorandum, solely ‍‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌​‌‌​​​‍for their own information, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

Case Details

Case Name: Williams v. State

Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals

Date Published: Jul 28, 1992

Citations: 838 S.W.2d 25; 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1210; 1992 WL 174175; No. 60999

Docket Number: No. 60999

Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.