History
  • No items yet
midpage
Williams v. State
329 S.W.2d 284
Tex. Crim. App.
1959
Check Treatment
MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

The offense is resisting arrest; the punishment, a fine of $200.

The statement of facts before us contains the testimony of only three witnesses and is not approved as a statement of all the facts adduced upon the trial. For this reason, we are not in a position to pass upon the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction or the legality of the arrest of the appellant, which are the matters raised in the appellant’s brief. See Dominguez v. State, 164Tex.Cr.R. 571, 303 S.W.2d 384, and Stockman v. State, 164 Tex.Cr.R. 469, 303 S.W.2d 410.

Finding no reversible error, the judgment is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Williams v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Oct 28, 1959
Citation: 329 S.W.2d 284
Docket Number: No. 30931
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.