Williams v. State
85 So. 595
Ala. Ct. App.
1920
Check Treatment

The judgment in this case is affirmed on authority of Todd v. State, 13 Ala. App. 301, 69 So. 325; the principle there announced being here reaffirmed, and the reasoning here adopted.

On the evidence, it was a question for the jury to say whether the defendant was sworn as a witness in the Hooten Case. The affirmative charge was properly refused.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.