History
  • No items yet
midpage
82 So. 3d 186
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
2012
*187 PER CURIAM.

We affirm Appellant’s conviction and fifteen-year Prison Releasee Reoffender sentence for burglary of a dwelling. However, we reverse the “Judgment for Fines, Costs, Fees and Surcharges” because the trial court failed to delineate the discretionary fine(s) when announcing at sentencing that it would impose $1,522.50 in costs and fines. Discretionary fines must be orally pronounced at sentencing. See Pullam v. State, 55 So.3d 674, 675 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011); Smiley v. State, 704 So.2d 191, 195 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). On remand, the court may reimpose the assessments after giving Appellant notice and following the proper procedure. See Oliver v. State, 75 So.3d 349, 350 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.

BENTON, C.J., DAVIS, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Williams v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Mar 12, 2012
Citations: 82 So. 3d 186; 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 3854; 2012 WL 769471; 1D10-6452
Docket Number: 1D10-6452
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In