Williams v. StateWilliams v. State
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Charles W. Musgrove, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
BOYER, Chief Judge.
Appellant was convicted of manslaughter and sentenced to serve six months imprisonment and nine and one-half years probation. On appeal, he argues that his conviction should be reversed because of the trial court‘s error in failing to direct a verdict of acquittal and the refusal of the trial court to give a requested jury instruction.
Appellant was prosecuted for the shooting death of Jackie Green who, along with appellant and an entire cast of characters, was present at Spud‘s Bar in St. Johns County on December 15, 1975. The fracas began when an inebriated Willie Webb bumped against a table in the bar and was knocked down by Joe Evans. A spirited discussion ensued, during which a pistol went off, a knife was pulled, and a shotgun was stuck in appellant‘s stomach. It appeared at this point that the matter would end peacefully, as the participants began “cooling down“. It was only at this juncture that a car bearing the victim pulled into Spud‘s parking lot. The victim was not involved in any fashion with the altercation which had just occurred, and appellant had no ill feelings toward him whatsoever. However, when the driver of the car which brought the deceased to the scene removed a shotgun from the trunk of his automobile, appellant went to his own truck and retrieved his shotgun, which he held pointed towards the ground while he talked to a group outside the bar. Appellant knew that the gun was loaded but claimed that he did not know whether the safety was on or off. Soon thereafter, appellant‘s shotgun discharged, thereby striking Jackie Green who was taken to Putnam Memorial Hospital where he was pronounced dead upon arrival.
Under the above-stated facts, we find that the trial court was correct in granting appellant‘s motion for judgment of acquittal as to second degree murder, but in denying his motion as to the lesser included offense of manslaughter. The evidence was sufficient to establish a jury question as to whether appellant was culpably negligent. The cases cited by appellant, specifically Getzie v. State, Fla.App. 4th 1966, 193 So. 2d 679, and Sharpe v. State, Fla.App. 2d 1960, 120 So. 2d 206, are factually distinguishable. More on point is McBride v. State, Fla.App. 1st 1966, 191 So. 2d 70.
The trial court also declined to instruct the jury that “a person who by reason of threats or prior difficulties has reason to fear that he may be in danger of death or of great bodily harm at the hands
AFFIRMED.
McCORD, J., and SCHLEGEL, LEW E., Associate Judge, concur.