History
  • No items yet
midpage
Williams v. Stack
269 So. 2d 771
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1972
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Petitioner’s original direct appeal from a judgment and sentence imposed upon *772conviction of the unlawful sale of LSD was frustrated by an untimely filed notice of appeal by court appointed counsel.

We grant petitioner a belated review of the judgment and sentence equivalent to a direct appeal by means of this habeas corpus proceeding. Henninger v. State, 230 So.2d 149 (Fla.1970).

We dispense with oral argument pursuant to F.A.R. 3.10(e), 32 F.S.A. We have examined the briefs and record, and conclude that petitioner has failed to demonstrate reversible error. Accordingly, the judgment and sentence is affirmed and habeas corpus denied.

Habeas corpus denied.

REED, C. J., and CROSS and OWEN, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Williams v. Stack
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Dec 7, 1972
Citation: 269 So. 2d 771
Docket Number: No. 72-353
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.