History
  • No items yet
midpage
Williams v. Sebring Housing & Development
723 So. 2d 359
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1998
Check Treatment
CASANUEVA, Judge.

The Williamses appeal a final order dismissing, with prejudice, their initial verified complaint against Sebring Housing and Development Authority, their landlord, and the landlord’s manager, Parent Management Company, Although the trial court was correct to dismiss the complaint as pleaded, we reverse the dismissal because it was done with prejudice. At this stage of the proceeding, it cannot be said that the Williamses could not plead circumstances that would entitle them to relief. See Hajec v. Town of Medley, 189 So.2d 835 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966); Matthews v. Matthews, 122 So.2d 571 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960). The Williamses should be given the opportunity to submit an amended complaint, if they are able to do so, that properly sets forth the elements of a cause of action. See Plant v. Decker, 486 So.2d 37 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).

*360Affirmed in part; reversed in part; and remanded for further proceedings.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., and QUINCE, J., Concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Williams v. Sebring Housing & Development
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Dec 23, 1998
Citation: 723 So. 2d 359
Docket Number: No. 98-00421
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.