History
  • No items yet
midpage
Williams v. Scudder
258 U.S. 607
SCOTUS
1922
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1) Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580, 583; Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Graham, 253 U. S. 193, 195. (2) Gaar, Scott & Co. v. Shannon, 223 U. S. 468 470; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. *608Northern Realty Co., 244 U. S. 300, 303; Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257; Farson, Son & Co. v. Bird, 248 U. S. 268, 271.

Mr. Smith W. Bennett for plaintiffs in error. Mr. John G. Price and Mr. Roy Martin for defendants in error.

Case Details

Case Name: Williams v. Scudder
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Mar 27, 1922
Citation: 258 U.S. 607
Docket Number: No. 352
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.