History
  • No items yet
midpage
Williams v. Quarterspot, Inc
1:19-cv-00936
E.D. Cal.
Mar 14, 2022
Check Treatment
Docket
Case Information

*1 Case 1:19-cv-00936-JLT-EPG Document 31 Filed 03/14/22 Page 1 of 2 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-0936 JLT EPG GRACIELA WILLIAMS, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DISMISSING THE ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff, v. (Doc. 30)

QUARTERSPOT, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Graciela Williams initiated this action pro se , seeking to establish the rights and duties of the parties related to a loan. ( See Doc. 1.) The magistrate judge determined Williams failed to prosecute this action and failed to comply with the Local Rules requiring parties to keep the Court informed of a proper mailing address. In addition, the magistrate judge found Williams failed to comply with the Court’s order dated July 15, 2019, which indicated the importance of keeping a current address on file for the Court. ( See Doc. 30 at 1-2, citing Doc. 5-3.) Therefore, the magistrate judge recommended the action be dismissed without prejudice on February 7, 2022. ( Id. at 3.)

The Findings and Recommendations were served upon all parties—including the only known address for Williams—and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within fourteen days of service. (Doc. 30 at 3.) In addition, the parties were “advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may result in the waiver of rights on appeal.” ( Id. , citing Wilkerson v. Wheeler , 772 F.3d 834, 838-39 (9th Cir. 2014); Baxter v. Sullivan , 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991).) The Findings

1

*2 Case 1:19-cv-00936-JLT-EPG Document 31 Filed 03/14/22 Page 2 of 2 and Recommendations served on Williams were returned as undeliverable on February 9, 2021. To 1 date, no objections have been filed by either party.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that the magistrate judge’s Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis. Based upon the foregoing, the Court ORDERS :

1. The Findings and Recommendations entered on February 7, 2022 (Doc. 30) are ADOPTED .
2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice; and 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 13, 2022

2

Case Details

Case Name: Williams v. Quarterspot, Inc
Court Name: District Court, E.D. California
Date Published: Mar 14, 2022
Docket Number: 1:19-cv-00936
Court Abbreviation: E.D. Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.