History
  • No items yet
midpage
Williams v. Huffman
371 F. App'x 438
4th Cir.
2010
Check Treatment
Docket

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Chauncey A. Williams appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Huffman, No. 7:09-cv-00222-sgw-mfu, 2009 WL 3367062 (W.D.Va. Oct. 16, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case Details

Case Name: Williams v. Huffman
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Mar 23, 2010
Citation: 371 F. App'x 438
Docket Number: No. 09-8063
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.