History
  • No items yet
midpage
Williams v. Giddens
485 So. 2d 493
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1986
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court order which requires both parties and the child to submit to a Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) typing blood test but disapprove of that portion of the order which states that the test shall be dispositive of paternity. This case is substantially the same as, and is controlled by, Joyner v. Hair, 485 So.2d 491 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).

We remand the cause to the trial court to strike that portion of the order which states that the test shall be dispositive. The parties should be given the opportunity *494to present any other evidence which is relevant and material to the issue of paternity.

Affirmed and remanded with directions.

Case Details

Case Name: Williams v. Giddens
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Mar 25, 1986
Citation: 485 So. 2d 493
Docket Number: No. 85-2324
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.