157 P. 963 | Mont. | 1916
delivered the opinion of the court.
When this cause was before us on the first appeal (50 Mont. 142, 145 Pac. 957), the judgment and order were reversed, and a new trial ordered “at the cost of the respondents.” When appellant presented her memorandum of costs incurred on appeal, respondents moved the district court to tax all proper costs against the funds of the estate and not against them individually, and appealed from the order denying their motion.
In determining the appeals as was done, the disposition of
The order is affirmed.
Affirmed.