Case Information
*1 ORIGINAL 1139-15 IN THE CAURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF AUSTIN TEXAS
BOREN WILLIAMS APPELLANT VS THE STATES OF TEXAS APPELLEE
COWT OF APPEALS. NÜMBER, OZCOURT CEDENNEMERGEREER
NOV-24-2015
Abel Acosta, Clerk
ON PETITION FOR DISCREATIDNARY REVIEW FROM THE DECISION OF THE CAURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS, AT FAST WORTH TEXAS IN CALSE NUMBER, L33878ED, HON, WAYNE FRANCIS SALVANT, AFFIRMING APPELLANTS CONVICTION AND SENTENACE IN THIS MATER, PRESIDING FROM THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT CAURT NUMBER 2 OF TARRANT COUNITY, TEXAS.
APPELLANTS PETITION FOR DISCREATIDNARY FILLED INREVIEW COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
BABBY WILLIAMS * 0361310 Abel Acosta, Clerk TARRANT COUNITY TAIL 100 WORTH L AMAR. ST. FAST WORTH, TEXAS, 76196 TRIAL ATTORNEY - RICHARD SCOT WALKER APPELLANT, PRO-SE 222 W. EXCHANGE AVEC FORT WORTH, TX, 76169
*2 | TABLE OF CONTENTS | | | --- | --- | | INDEX | | | TABLE OF AUTHORITIES | 1 | | STATEMENT REVARDING ORAL ARESMENT | 2 | | STATEMENT OF THE CASE | 3 | | STATEMENT OF PROCEDURAL HISTORY | 4 | | GROUNDS FOR REVIEW | 5 | | REASON FOR REVIEW | 6 | | FRANK FOR RELIEF | 7 | | CERTIFICATE OF COMPLAINCE | 8 | | CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE | 9 | | AFFENDIXS | 10 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
*3
3.
2.
JNdex OF Authorities
- Article 571.003 of texas Health and Safety Code and Ann G19.01
- DeFRECE V. state, 898 S.Mad 150, 159 (TEx. cem. AP.
- Hereford vs state, 339, S.M. 3d. U. 1, 149 (TEx. cem AP 2011.
- JACKSON, 857 S. N 2d, 128 TEX. APP-HOUSTON 14th. DUF.
- Mrothoff, 762 S.Mad, 916 TEX. APP-SAD Antonio
- NUNEZ, 992 S. N 2 d 57 TEX. APP-COPAL CHEUST.
- United States vs. Western, 255 F3d 873 C.D.C.
- STRICKLAND VS. WASHINGTON, 904 U.S. 668, 109 S. CT. 2052, 80 L. Ed 2 d 679.
- The American Disahilum Acr
- H0ods, 59 S.M. 3d 833 TEX. APP-TEXARKAUA
*4 ATPICAN' REQUENT THAT THE COURT OF CERUMINAL ATPICAN' NANVE AIS ORAL ARGUMENT, ATPICAN' STRONSLY FEEUS THAT THE RECORD SPARK FOR TRANSFERENT ATPICAN'S MEDICA' STAULS "MEN'TAL'S ILL" CLOURLY DORONSTAND THE COURT LAME OF PRESENTINS MITI SANTS, CIRCUNSTAN'RE CONSIDERATION, DUE TO CENT' ATPIONTE' ATTORNEYS FALVEST TO TATTER THE NESSARY AND ENKEN MEDICAL. HISTORY.
STATEMENT OF CASE
THE ESTRE NANVE OF THE CASE CONTANDS THAT THE ATPICAN' FALVEST TO RESTAME AS A SEV OFFERCE. THE ATPICAN' DOES NOT DUPING THE SEVATIONS, ONLY THAT HE' NAS NOT IN his RUSH STATE OF MUND' AT THE THE OF THE OFFERCE DUE TO his LENSTALL HISTORY OF MORTHL ILLNESS.
STATEMENT OF PROCEDURE HISTORY
THE COURT OF ATPICAN' TSSUED IT'S OPICAN ON THE 20th, DAY OF AUGUST, 2015. ATPICAN'S RETTNAV FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIER US TIMELY FILEd ON OR RESTAME, NONEMENT, 20th, 2015.
*5 GROUNDS FOR REVIEN A) INSTRUCTURY ASSEMBLES OF CONSIST, COURT ATTENDED ATTENGEY FALLERS TO PRESIDENT HITIZATIONS CHECINOMICEST OF APPERLANT MENORAL. INVOLS. B) MUTIZATURY CHECINOMICS/EXCEPTOUR, CHECINOMICEST COULD RANE had A MADE IMPACT ON THE SONVANCES PRESS ALLOWING THE APPLICANT TO RESOUE COMPULSED FROM THE COURT.
ARGUMENT
THE APPERLANT should have BEACH PERSOND ON OPERATIONS TO PRESIDENT HIS MENORAL. HEAST TATING IT NED CONSIDERATION AT TENE OF SONVANCES, THEME WORST OTHER OPERAT THAN should have BEACH CONSIDERED. APPERLANT SMOY MENORAL STEEL (6) MAVING IN THE STAIRS MENORAL HOSADEL dUNING THE CASE, YET THEY COURT ATTENDED ATTENGEY (6) would NOT OR PERSOND TO PRESIDENT HAY EUDENICS AT THE TIME OF THE SONVANCES. HEST TO BE CONSIDERED. YALUD MESENNANT THE THEY PRESIDENTY OF A MENORAL. HEAST TAY REDEAM ALTERNATURE TO PRESIDENT HIS
*6 RECUMENT CONTINUED
THE REASONS FOR FRANCUS REVIEN AND CLES (66.3) THERE IS A CLES VIOLENNA OF STARS AND FORGER LAND THAN have BEEN EUDENT FROM THE VEY BEENNUE, THIS IS A SEVERE MORTally EL. ADVICAN, WITTEN THE ABDly TO REVIEN AND MORR RATINGATIONAL DECISIONS.
PREPORTE FOR REVIET
WHEATING, PENNUSST CONSIDERED, ADVICAN THAYS THAT THIS COURT REVERSE THE COURT OF ADVORSE AND REVIENING THE CASE FOR FIFTER PROCESSINGS TO THE TREND COURT FOR A SEVIOACAN, HARRUDS IN WILK MUTSANUS, TICKET WILL BE CONSIDERED FOR THE PSSIDELY OF LENGY AND OF CONSIDERSE.
RATHWY WILLIAMS AFFICANT TRENDS
*7
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLASICS
R1rsum 70 Rule 7.4 (c) of the TEXAS Rule of APPELMS Procedures, The total number of TAXES WHEAL HAND WRITTEN ON THE PERMAN ENE DECESTAWAY REVIEN AND WITH A CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE FOLLOWED BELOW.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
- Bobby Williams, APPELCANY, PEA-SE CERTIFY THAT ON THE 15th Day OF NOVE-ONEER, SOUS, A TRUE COPY OF THE FORTFONS WAS SERVED ON THE FOLLOWING.
THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPELLS OF TAXES PASY OFFICE BOX 12302 (of CLARK) CARIOL STATION ALSOUS, TAXES, 78211 (1 COPIES)
COURT OF APPELLS (OT ClARK) SECOND DISTRICT OF TAXES 400 WEST BELKHA (SURTE 7000) FORT NIGENT, 70007 71191.
*8
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE CONF
District Attendeys office yo ctrerlax m. malu (APPEALIAN SEX) tob West BetrNAP Feer North, 1924, 2656 District Center Check yo tom NIDER 400 West BetrNAP Feer North, 1924, 7656
*9
*10
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-15-00232-CR
Bobby Williams v.
The State of Texas § From Criminal District Court No. 2 § of Tarrant County (1399744D) § August 20, 2015 § Per Curiam § (nfp)
JUDGMENT
This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed.
SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS PER CURIAM
*11
B0hW MLLLans - hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above motion was served on Attorney for the State Sharon Wilson by mailing via first class mail to SHARON WILSON, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, 401 W. BELKWAP ST., FORT WORTH, TX 76196 on this 15thsay of NOVENBER, 2015
B0hy M Lllans
[Defendant's Name], Defendant Pro Se CID086131D DOB 9/21/1962 100 N. Lamar St. Fort Worth, TX 76102-1954
*12
Verification of Unawom Declaration
BobbY WILuARS
Defendant pro se in the cause, state the following under penalty of perjury: I am a prisoner. 0361310 currently incarcerated in the Tarrant County Jail in Tarrant County, Texas I am duly quilted and authorized in all respects to make this declaration. I have read the foregoing Rertion for and declare that I have personal knowledge of the facts contained therein and said facts are true and correct.
EXECUTED in Tarrant County, Texas, pursuant to Art. 132.001 et. seq., Texas C.P.R.C. and 28 USC , on this 15thday of November 15
BobbY WILLIAMS
(Signatury Defendant pro se
Bobby WILuARS
(Press Name) CID 0361310 DOB 9211962 100 North Lancer Street Address FORT. NORTH, TEXAS, 76196 *Under both federal law (28 USC ) and state law (Art. 132.001, Texas C.P.R.C.), inmates incarcerated in Texas may use an unsworn declaration under penalty of perjury in place of a written declaration sworn before a notary public.
*13
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-15-00232-CR
BOBBY WILLIAMS APPELLANT V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE
FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 2 OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 1399744D
MEMORANDUM OPINION [1]
Appellant Bobby Williams pled guilty to failing to comply with sexual offender registration requirements, a third-degree felony, [2] and true to the enhancement allegations and judicially confessed in exchange for two years' confinement. The trial court followed the plea bargain, convicted Appellant of the
*14
offense, and sentenced him to two years' confinement. The trial court's certification states that the case was plea-bargained and that Appellant has no right of appeal. Accordingly, we informed Appellant by letter that this appeal would be dismissed absent a response showing grounds for continuing it. [3] Appellant filed a motion to represent himself and a motion for an extension of time to file a brief on the merits, but nothing he filed provides a ground that would allow his appeal. We therefore dismiss this appeal, and we dismiss Appellant's pending motions as moot. [4]
PER CURIAM
PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ. DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b) DELIVERED: August 20, 2015
*15
NOTES
See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 62.102(a)-(b)(2) (West Supp. 2014).
See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d).
See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 43.2(f).