History
  • No items yet
midpage
William W. v. Hodges
2 Cranch 452
U.S. Circuit Court for the Dis...
1824
Check Treatment

So decided

by the Court.

Verdict for defendant.

Motion for new trial on the ground of misdirection of the jury by the Court, overruled. The Court said that between immediate parties parol evidence is admissible to show that there was no consideration, and that the defendant did not indorse the note to give it credit; and that this was in effect the substance of the instruction given.

Jndgment for defendant. The note was for $418.55.

Case Details

Case Name: William W. v. Hodges
Court Name: U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
Date Published: Apr 15, 1824
Citation: 2 Cranch 452
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.