William Thomas Henderson v. Franklin Freeman

95-6316 | 4th Cir. | Oct 23, 1995

68 F.3d 460" date_filed="1995-10-06" court="4th Cir." case_name="Randy Allen Orga Dusty Stanaway v. Preston S. Williams, Individually and in His Capacity as Sheriff of York County">68 F.3d 460

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
William Thomas HENDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Franklin FREEMAN, Secretary, North Carolina Department of
Corrections, Defendant-Appellee,
and
Hazel Keith, North Carolina Department of Corrections;
Finesse Couch, Director, North Carolina Inmate Grievance
Resolution Board; Fred R. Wrangham, Superintendent, Stanley
Correctional Center; Mr. Stevenson, Superintendent, Harnett
County Correctional Center; Rick Jackson, Superintendent,
Brown Creek Correctional Center; North Carolina Parole
Commission; Jim Hunt, Governor, Defendants.

No. 95-6316.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 12, 1995.
Decided: Oct. 23, 1995.

William Thomas Henderson, Appellant Pro Se.

William McBlief, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Henderson v. Freeman, No. CA-94-294-3-MU (W.D.N.C. Jan. 25, 1995). We deny Appellant's motion for the appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED