History
  • No items yet
midpage
William Lee Anderson, II v. Philip H. Witherspoon
704 F. App'x 238
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Lee Anderson, II, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER & COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William Lee Anderson, II, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Anderson’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Anderson v. Witherspoon , No. 7:15-cv- 00236-MFU-JCH (W.D. Va. Mar. 30, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case Details

Case Name: William Lee Anderson, II v. Philip H. Witherspoon
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Nov 22, 2017
Citation: 704 F. App'x 238
Docket Number: 17-6667
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.