History
  • No items yet
midpage
William Coonts v. Randolph County Commission
16-1537
| 4th Cir. | Nov 29, 2016
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Wayne Coonts, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Clee Chenoweth, Peter G. Zurbuch, BUSCH, ZURBUCH & THOMPSON, PLLC, Elkins, West Virginia; David K. Hendrickson, HENDRICKSON & LONG, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *3 PER CURIAM:

William Wayne Coonts appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motions to dismiss Coonts’ civil action. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Coonts’ informal brief does not challenge the district court’s dispositive analysis, Coonts has waived appellate review of the court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case Details

Case Name: William Coonts v. Randolph County Commission
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Nov 29, 2016
Docket Number: 16-1537
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.