History
  • No items yet
midpage
William Chappell v. Dr. William Reese
16-7611
| 4th Cir. | Mar 17, 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Chappell, Appellant Pro Se. Alexander Francuzenko, Philip Corliss Krone, COOK CRAIG & FRANCUZENKO, PLLC, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *3 PER CURIAM:

William Chappell appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Chappell v. Reese, No. 1:16-cv-00113-LMB-IDD (E.D. Va. Nov. 4, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case Details

Case Name: William Chappell v. Dr. William Reese
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Mar 17, 2017
Docket Number: 16-7611
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.