| Pa. | Sep 15, 1834
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
This is the ordinary case of an action for the illegal detention of a personal chattel, for which trover is the proper remedy. But to support assumpsit, the form of action which the plaintiff thought proper to adopt to try the right of property, the court instructed the jury that they might presume a sale by the plaintiff to the defendant. I cannot perceive, nor has the counsel attempted to point out, the slightest testimony by which the jury would be warranted in making any such presumption. On the argument this ground wa.s abandoned, and the plaintiff contends that he may waive the tort, and recover the value of the goods; but this can only be done when the tortfeasor has sold the article and received the money. In such a case an action for money had and received may be sustained.
Judgment reversed.