WILLARD v. BANK OF AMERICAWILLARD v. BANK OF AMERICA
O R D E R
AND NOW, this 6th day of September, 2016, upon consideration of: (1) the “Motion to Dismiss by Defendants Bank of America, N.A., Banc of America Consumer Card Services, LLC, and BA Credit Card Funding, LLC” (ECF No. 8); (2) “Defendant, Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore, LLC‘s, Motion for Leave to Join Bank of America‘s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff‘s Complaint with Prejudice” (ECF No. 12); (3) “Defendant, Blatt Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore, LLC‘s, Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice and/or Strike Amended Complaint, Filed 6/30/16” (ECF No. 23); (4) “Defendant, Blatt Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore, LLC‘s, Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice and/or Strike Amended Complaint,” amended (ECF No. 25); (5) the “Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint by Defendants Bank of America,
- the ”
Motion to Dismiss by Defendants Bank of America, N.A., Banc of America Consumer Card Services, LLC, and BA Credit Card Funding, LLC” (ECF No. 8), is DENIED as moot. - “Defendant, Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker &
Moore, LLC‘s, Motion for Leave to Join Bank of America‘s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff‘s Complaint with Prejudice” (ECF No. 12), “Defendant, Blatt Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore, LLC‘s, Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice and/ or Strike Amended Complaint, Filed 6/30/16” (ECF No. 23), and “Defendant, Blatt Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore, LLC‘s, Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice and/or Strike Amended Complaint,” amended (ECF No. 25) are DENIED as moot. - The “Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint by Defendants Bank of America, N.A., Banc of America Consumer Card Services, LLC, and BA Credit Card Funding, LLC” (ECF No. 29) is GRANTED. The Amended Complaint is
DISMISSED with prejudice.
The Clerk of Court shall mark this case as CLOSED.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Eduardo C. Robreno
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J.