23 Ind. App. 162 | Ind. Ct. App. | 1899
In this cause there are several specifications of error not assigned and not passed upon in Lewis v. Albertson, ante, 147.
The first discussed is the overruling of the demurrer to the second paragraph of reply. This paragraph was pleaded as an estoppel. The reply avers that plaintiff did not enter into the contract for the street improvement, but in view of the whole pleading, which avers that he began the improve
The eighth specification of error is the overruling of appellants’ motion for a new trial. This motion does not appear in the record. The other questions discussed are decided in Lewis v. Albertson, ante, 147, and upon the authority cff that decision the judgment is affirmed.