In the Matter of ANITA WILKINS, Respondent, v ROHAN WILKINS, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 29, 2007
850 NYS2d 538
Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
Where issues of credibility are presented, the factual determinations of a hearing court are afforded great weight on appeal and will not be disturbed if warranted by the record (see Matter of Spillman v Spillman, 40 AD3d 770 [2007]; McKiernan v McKiernan, 274 AD2d 560 [2000]; see generally Northern Westchester Professional Park Assoc. v Town of Bedford, 60 NY2d 492, 499 [1983]).
The record supports the Supreme Court‘s determination that the husband violated an order of protection by going to the home of a mutual acquaintance of the parties, and looking for the wife while armed with an unsheathed machete only two days after being denied visitation with the parties’ son (cf. Matter of Sarmuksnis v Priest, 21 AD3d 381 [2005]; Matter of Louvaris v Louvaris, 209 AD2d 524 [1994]; Matter of Lentino v Lentino, 185 AD2d 849 [1992]).
The husband‘s remaining contentions are without merit.
Spolzino, J.P., Skelos, Florio and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.
