Wilkerson v. 134 Kitty's Corp.Wilkerson v. 134 Kitty's Corp.
However, as to the negligence cause of action including, inter alia, the issue of piercing the corporate veil as to the defendant Efren Rivera, the appellants failed to establish their prima facie showing of entitlement to summary judgment (see Giuffrida v Citibank Corp., 100 NY2d 72, 81 [2003]; Matter of Morris v New York State Dept. of Taxation & Fin., 82 NY2d 135, 141 [1993]; Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]; Allstate Ins. Co. v Persampire, 45 AD3d 706 [2007]).
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the appellants’ motion which was to change the venue of the action from Kings County to Otsego County based upon “the convenience of material witnesses and the ends of justice” (
The appellants’ remaining contention is without merit.
Rivera, J.P., Miller, Dillon and Belen, JJ., concur.