Wilkerson, Senrick Shern, WR-77,138-31

Wilkerson, Senrick Shern

WR-77,138-31

| Tex. App. | Jun 2, 2015

Check Treatment

Case Information

*1 SENRICK S. WILKERSON IBESINS

Rames, I Unit

This document contains some 1100 FM 655 7E-2-17T pages that are of poor quality at the time of imaging.

May 25, 2015

FELICIA PI'RE District Clerk Frank Crawley Court BLDG 133 N. Riverfront Blvd., L8.12 Dallas, Texas 75207

RE: BOND Information From FOBECKIS Compelling Prostitution DANS District Attorney's Office,

On 11/27/2010, the State issued capias arrest warrants for cause No. F0-0182, F0-0183, F0-0184 & F0-0185, Also, on 11/27/2010, your office dismissed all four US warrants, but there was also a capias arrest warrant issued on 11/27/2010, for a bond forfixture from FOBECKIS Compelling Prostitution, but once did any peace officer ever come to my home to arrest me, but on 12/3/2010, Judge Gracie G. Lewis signed some invalid and fraudulent PR bonds from cause No. F0-0182, F0-0183, F0-0184 & F0-0185, when I was never once in any custody for them, never once detained for them, and never once arrested for them. My question is simply, this: How did the Courts make the capias warrant from the bond forfixture, in cause No. F0-0182, 90 aware? I was tricked into signing those other invalid PR bonds, by Calvin D. Johnson, bonds, on 11/31/2010, to question her about the bond forfixture from cause No. F0-0182, And she had no idea what I was talking about because she specifically told me that 6.26 bus bonds, had not forfeited my bond, she told me that she would call me back because she was going to Call Calvin Johnson. Instead, Calvin Johnson called me and told me that I used to stop calling bond companies because he claimed I would mess things up for him! So, I am requesting the BOND Information from the capias arrest warrant from FOBECKIS Compelling Prostitution, in warrant issued on 11/27/2010. Thanks for your time and a speedy response would be speedy appreciated.

P.S. Shequard my Liberty

Sincerely,

BERRICK S. WILKERSON ISBSSEN Ramsay I Unit 1100 EM 655 7E-2-17T Rosharon, Texas 77583 May 22,2015

COURT OF CRIMINAL AFFEALS P.O. Box 12308 Supreme Courts BUSs Austin, TX 78711 c/o United States Court of Affects FFth Circuit Office of the Clerk 600 S. MHESTRI PL New Orleans, Louisiana 70130 c/o 60 Minutes Investigating Reporters 524 West 577 H Street New York, NY 10019

c/o Supreme Court of United States Office of the Clerk Washington, DC 20543-0001 c/o Felicita Pithe DSTAICt clerk SUSAN HHWK DSTRICT, ATJERNEY Frank Crowley Court Building 133 N. Auerfront Blvd., L612 Dallas, Texas 75207 c/o Fox 4 News Investigations 400 N. Griffith Street Dallas Texas 75202

RE: Fraudulently Fereed and Falsified Documents from Cause/Unit Nos. W08-6083-300, W10-0183-368/8 W10-0184-3(F)

Attn: Aboued Entities,

I am writing this letter respectfully requesting that there be an immediate and thorough investigations executed in regards to the illegal convictions from Fox 40213 compelling Prostitution F0-0183 sexual Performance by a Child &; F10-0184 Sexual Assault on a child. I was never once arrested and never arranged for cause nos. F0-0183 &; F0-0184, but Dallas County District Attorneys office is showing fraudulently, Four (4) different arrest dates for then that nefor happened. I was illegally convicted and sentenced to 8 years TOCS, on 12/17/2010, for all three(3) offenses. On 12/17/200 deficient and ineffective lawyer (Alvin D. Johnson filed the motion for new trial, on January 5,2011, the motion for new trial was granted by the Juke. I was never once informed by anyone, and I first received the granted motion for new trial in June of 2014. See attached Declaration of my facts/statements of.

P.S. Safeguard my Liberty

Sincerely

*3 INMATE'S DECLARATION OF SENRICK WILKERSON "I, Sennick Wilkerson, TOCI No. 158546, do state the following facts concerning the 1585523 compelling prostitution, FIO-CUSS Sexual Performance by a child &; FIO-OVER Sexual Assault by a Child offenses:

I am the Defendmont in the three(s) mentioned cases, and I was illegally convicted, and sentenced to 8 years TOCI, on 12/17/2010. I was never once ever arrested, never arraamed, never taken before a magistrate judge, never read, any Miranda Rights, never given an opportunity to post bull, never once informed of any rights to an examining trial or counsel, and never once participated in any first preliminary initial appearances, as is required by Texas Law, for cause No. FIO-CUSS &; FIO-OVER, but Dallas County District Attorney's office is showing four(s) different arrest dates through Forgery and Falsifying government documents.

On 12/17/2010, malpracticed deficient and ineffective lawyer Calum D. Johnson filed the motion for new trial for cause No. F08-50213, FIO-CUSS &; FIO-OVER. On January 5, 2010, the Courts date stamped the motion for new trial, but mend to stamp January 5, 2011, which is the date that the motion for new trial was granted. See Exhibit A. However, the Courts claim that the markings are illegible, but that simply is not true. The trial Judge was Judge Keith Dean, and it appears that Judge Dean signed the motion for new trial after he circled granted. See Exhibit B. If you compare the signatures in Exhibits A and B; then in Exhibit C, you will notice that the signatures all look the same. Evidencing that Judge Keith Dean granted and signed the motion for new trial.

On April 1, 2015, the Court of Criminal Appeals remmended my 11.07 Unit of Haten Corpus application, cause No. W58-50213-703, and requested that the Trial Courts determine who signed the motion for new trial. See Exhibit D, which is a copy of the Affiduit of Pat McDowell, whom is the sitting Judge in Auxiliary Court No. 7, where my illegal trial was heard. Notice that in Exhibit D, Judge McDowell claims that its his signature signed under Judge, in Exhibit A. Judge McDowell also stated that he did write, "I did not rule on this," and the signature was indeed his, Quoting Judge McDowell, "that signature may be mine but I cannot say with certainly that I signed it." Please compare the signatures in Exhibits A-D. The signature in Exhibit B, is totally different, than in Exhibits A-C. Judge Dean signed his own signatures, where it says Judge in Exhibits A-C. How did this granted motion for new trial end up back on Judge McDowell's desk, six months later, on 7/7/2011, for him to state that he did not rule on it. I am entitled to a new trial, and these is a matter of Jurisdiction at question.

I, Sennick Wilkerson, being presently illegally incarcerated in Ramsey I Unit, sedure under penalty of perjury that, according to my relief, the facts stated in this document are true and correct."

May 22, 2015 DWYR

SERVIRICK WILKERSON

*4 DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: Now comes the Defendant in the above cause and by his Attorney, and moves the Court to grant him a New Trial herein for the good and sufficient reason that the verdict is contrary to the law and the evidence.

WHEREFORE, Defendant prays the Court grant a new trial herein.

ORDER The above Motion is hereby

It appeared to the Court that Defendant was mentally competent and had pleaded as shown above to the charging instrument. Both parties announced ready for trial. A jury was selected, impaneled, and sworn. The INDICIMENT was read to the jury, and Defendant entered a plea to the charged offense. The Court received the plea and entered it of record.

The jury heard the evidence submitted and argument of counsel. The Court charged the jury as to its duty to determine the guilt or innocence of Defendant, and the jury retired to consider the evidence. Upon returning to open court, the jury delivered its verdict in the presence of Defendant and defense counsel, if any.

The Court received the verdict and Ordered it entered upon the minutes of the Court.

Punishment Assessed by Jury / Court / No election (select one)

No Election. Defendant did not file a written election as to whether the judge or jury should assess punishment. After hearing evidence relative to the question of punishment, the Court assessed Defendant's punishment as indicated above.

The Court Finds Defendant committed the above offense and ORDERS, ADJUDGES AND DECREES that Defendant is GUILTY of the above offense. The Court Finds the Presentence Investigation, if so ordered, was done according to the applicable provisions of Tex. COlte CRIm. Proc. art. $42.12 $ 9$ .

The Court Orders Defendant punished as indicated above. The Court Orders Defendant to pay all fines, court costs, and restitution as indicated above.

Punishment Options (select one)

Confinement in State Jail or Institutional Division. The Court Orders the authorized agent of the State of Texas or the Sheriff of this County to take, safely convey, and deliver Defendant to the Director, Institutional Division, TDCJ. The Court Orders Defendant to be confined for the period and in the manner indicated above. The Court Orders Defendant remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of this county until the Sheriff can obey the directions of this sentence. The Court Orders that upon release from confinement, Defendant proceed immediately to the Dallas County District Clerk Felony Collections Department. Once there, the Court Orders Defendant to pay, or make arrangements to pay, any remaining unpaid fines, court costs, and restitution as ordered by the Court above. County Jail-Confinement / Confinement in Lieu of Payment. The Court Orders Defendant immediately committed to the custody of the Sheriff of Dallas County, Texas on the date the sentence is to commence. Defendant shall be confined in the Dallas County Jail for the period indicated above. The Court Orders that upon release from confinement, Defendant shall proceed immediately to the Dallas County District Clerk Felony Collections Department. Once there, the Court Orders Defendant to pay, or make arrangements to pay, any remaining unpaid fines, court costs, and restitution as ordered by the Court above. $◻$ Fine Only Payment. The punishment assessed against Defendant is for a fine only. The Court Orders Defendant to proceed immediately to the Office of the Dallas County District Clerk Felony Collections Department. Once there, the Court Orders Defendant to pay or make arrangements to pay all fines and court costs as ordered by the Court in this cause.

Execution / Suspension of Sentence (select one)

The Court Orders Defendant's sentence executed. The Court Orders Defendant's sentence of confinement suspended. The Court Orders Defendant placed on community supervision for the adjudged period (above) so long as Defendant abides by and does not violate the terms and conditions of community supervision. The order setting forth the terms and conditions of community supervision is incorporated into this judgment by reference.

The Court Orders that Defendant is given credit noted above on this sentence for the time spent incarcerated.

Furthermore, the following special findings or orders apply:

The Court ORDERS Defendant to apply for an original or renewed Texas Driver's License or personal identification certificate not later than 30 days after release from confinement or upon receipt of written notice from the Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS). The Court further ORDERS Defendant to annually renew the license or certificate. The DPS shall place an indication on the Defendant's driver's license or personal identification certificate that the Defendant is subject to the sex offender registration requirements. The Court ORDERS the clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to the DPS and to Defendant. TEX. CODE CRIM-PROC. $\underset{―}{A}$ 42.016 Signed and entered on December 17, 2010

DEFENDANT EXCEPTS AND GIVES NOTICE OF APPEAL TO THE COURT OF APPEALS, FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS

Clerk:

THIS CASE IS

ON APPEAL THE STATE OF TEXAS V.

SENRICK SHERN WILKERSON STATE 1D NO.: TX07638642

CASE NO. F-0860213-J

INCIDENT NO. /TRN: 9174618571

IN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT

$8$ COURT #3 $8$ Dallas Country, Texas $8$ JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION BY JURY

| Judge Presiding: | Hon. Keith Dean | Date Judgment Entered: | $12 / 17 / 2010$ | | :--: | :--: | :--: | :--: | | Attorney for State: | Robb B Grona | Attorney for Defendant: | Calvin Johnson |

Offense for which Defendant Convicted: COMPELLING PROSTITUTION

| Charging Instrument: | | Statute for Offense 43.05 A 1 Penal Code | | :--: | :--: | :--: | | INDICTMENT | | | | Date of Offense: $4 / 16 / 2008$ | | | | Dearee of Offense: | | Plea to Odense: | | 2ND DEGREE FELONY | | NOT GUILTY | | Verdict of Jury: | | Findings on Deadly Weapon: | | GUILTY | | N/A | | Plea to $1^{st}$ Enhancement | | Plea to $2^{nd}$ Enhancement/Habitual | | Paragraph: | N/A | Paragraph: N/A | | Findings on $1^{st}$ Enhancement | | Findings on $2^{nd}$ | | Paragraph: | N/A | Enhancement/Habitual Paragraph: N/A | | Punishment Assessed by: | Date Sentence Imposed: | Date Sentence to Commence: | | COURT | $12 / 17 / 2010$ | $12 / 17 / 2010$ |

Punishment and Place 8 YEARS INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, TDCJ of Confinement: $8$ YEARS INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, TDCJ THIS SENTENCE SHALL KUN CONCURRENTLY. $◻$ SENTENCE OF CONFINEMENT SUBPENDED, DEFENDANT PLACED ON COMMUNITY SUPERVISION FOR N/A .

| Finc: | Court Const: | Restitution: | Restitution Perable to: | | :--: | :--: | :--: | :--: | | $$ N / A$ | $$ 510, 00$ | $$ N / A$ | $◻$ VICTIM (see below) $◻$ AGENCY/AGENT (see below) |

$◻$ Attachment A, Order to Withdraw Funds, is Incorporated into this judgment and made a part hereof. Sex Offender Registration Requirements apply to the Defendant. Tex. Cook Crim. Proc chapter 62. The age of the victim at the time of the offense was 16 years.

All pertinent information, names and assessments indicated above are incorporated into the language of the judgment below by reference. This cause was called for trial in Dallas County, Texas. The State appeared by her District Attorney. Counsel / Walver of Counsel (select one) Defendant appeared in person with Counsel. Defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived the right to representation by counsel in writing in open court.

It appeared to the Court that Defendant was mentally competent and had pleaded as shown above to the charging instrument. Both parties announced ready for trial. A jury was selected, impaneded, and sworn. The INDICTMENT was read to the jury, and Defendant entered a plea to the charged offense. The Court received the plea and entered it of record.

The Court received the verdict and Ordered it entered upon the minutes of the Court.

Punishment Assessed by Jury / Court / No election (select one)

Jury. Defendant entered a plea and filed a written election to have the jury assess punishment. The jury heard evidence relative to the question of punishment. The Court charged the jury and it retired to consider the question of punishment. After due deliberation, the jury was brought into Court, and, in open court, it returned its verdict as indicated above. $◻$ Court. Defendant elected to have the Court assess punishment. After hearing evidence relative to the question of punishment, the Court assessed Defendant's punishment as indicated above. $◻$ No Election. Defendant did not file a written election as to whether the judge or jury should assess punishment. After hearing evidence relative to the question of punishment, the Court assessed Defendant's punishment as indicated above.

The Court Orders Defendant punished as indicated above. The Court Orders Defendant to pay all fines, court costs, and restitution as indicated above.

Punishment Options (select one)

Confinement in State Jall or Institutional Division. The Court Orders the authorized agent of the State of Texas or the Sheriff of this County to take, safely convey, and deliver Defendant to the Director, Institutional Division, TDCJ. The Court Orders Defendant to be confined for the period and in the manner indicated above. The Court Orders Defendant remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of this county until the Sheriff can obey the directions of this sentence. The Court Orders that upon release from confinement, Defendant proceed immediately to the Dallas County District Clerk Felony Collections Department. Once there, the Court Orders Defendant to pay, or make arrangements to pay, any remaining unpaid fines, court costs, and restitution as ordered by the Court above. $◻$ County Jall-Confinement / Confinement in Lieu of Payment. The Court Orders Defendant immediately committed to the custody of the Sheriff of Dallas County, Texas on the date the sentence is to commence. Defendant shall be confined in the Dallas County Jail for the period indicated above. The Court Orders that upon release from confinement, Defendant shall proceed immediately to the Dallas County District Clerk Felony Collections Department. Once there, the Court Orders Defendant to pay, or make arrangements to pay, any remaining unpaid fines, court costs, and restitution as ordered by the Court above. $◻$ Fine Only Payment. The punishment assessed against Defendant is for a fine only. The Court Orders Defendant to proceed immediately to the Office of the Dallas County District Clerk Felony Collections Department. Once there, the Court Orders Defendant to pay or make arrangements to pay all fines and court costs as ordered by the Court in this cause.

Execution / Suspension of Sentence (select one)

The Court Orders that Defendant is given credit noted above on this sentence for the time spent incarcerated.

Furthermore, the following special findings or orders apply:

The Court ORDERS Defendant to apply for an original or renewed Texas Driver's license or personal identification certificate not later than 30 days after release from confinement or upon receipt of written notice from the Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS). The Court further ORDERS Defendant to annually renew the license or certificate. The DPS shall place an indication on the Defendant's driver's license or personal identification certificate that the Defendant is subject to the sex offender registration requirements. The Court ORDERS the clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to the DPS and to Defendant. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 42.016

Signed and entered on December 17, 2010

AFFIDAVIT OF PAT MCDOWELL

COUNTY OF DALLAS

STATE OF TEXAS

BEFORE ME, the undersigned official, on this day appeared Pat McDowell, who is personally known to me, and first being duly sworn according to law upon his oath, deposed and said as follows:

My name is Pat McDowell. I am over 18 years of age, and I am fully competent to make this affidavit. I have personal knowledge of the facts stated herein, and they are all true and correct.

I am a Senior Judge presiding over the Drug Court in Dallas County by assignment. I have reviewed the writ file and the court file associated with Senrick Wilkerson in cause numbers W08-60213-J(A) and F08-60213-J. The judgment in cause number F08-60213-J indicates that the case was tried by Judge Keith Dean. (See attached judgment). Judge Dean was acting as a visiting judge in Drug Court at the time the case was heard. Among the papers in cause number F08-60213-J is a motion for new trial signed and submitted by Calvin Johnson, Applicant's trial attorney. (See attached motion #1). The motion for new trial is file-stamped January 5, 2010, but OnBase indicates that it was filed on January 5, 2011. (See printout from OnBase ^[1] ). Also among those papers is another copy of the motion for new trial which includes a signature in the portion of the motion which is to be signed by the Judge. (See attached motion #2). That signature may be mine but I cannot say with certainty that I signed it. I do know that directly below that signature I recognize a notation that was written, signed, and dated by me, indicating that I did not act on the motion for new trial. That notation is dated " $7 / 7 / 11$ " and OnBase indicates that it was filed on that day. (See printout from OnBase). It is likely that the motion for new trial was presented to me after Judge Dean tried the case. While the signature on the motion may be mine, I did not grant a motion for new trial in this case. My signed notation shows that I did not grant or act on the motion.

FURTHER, Affiant sayeth not.

Affidavit of Pat McDowell Page 1

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME, on the 33 day of April 2015, to certify which witness my hand and official seal.

Rish W. SOlomar

Signature Robin W. Solomon. Printed Name