Case Information
*1 SENAICK S. WILKERSON 1885146 771138 34,35 Ramsey I Unit 1100 FN 655 7E-2-17T Rosharon, TX 77583 May 23,2015 RECEIVED IN COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS JUN 052015 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS P.O. Box 12308
Capital Station Abel Acosta, Clerk Austin, TX 78711 RE: Writ Nos. 4010-0183-3(5).8 4010-0184-3(F) Dear Court of Criminal Appeals.
I am returning my objections to state's response to the writ of habeas corpus to you. On May 29,2015, I received a letter from this court, dated May 26,2015, where it stated that there are no records showing any writ of Habeas Corpus' for both cases above. On May 11,2015, the State File its response for writ Nos. 4010-0183-3(5) 8 4010-0184-3(F). The State should have already fowded his applications, et cetera. Therefore, I am returning my documents back to you, respectfully requesting for this court to thorough review my objections and responses. Thanks, in advance for your time and a very speedy response would be greatly appreciated.
Sincerely, in 1980
RS. Please safeguard my libenty
*2
The State continues to deny Applicant the Records from the above cause. The District Attorney's office do not have any Pabes for the state, laufully never dோ Sureshation after the Performance by a Child &; FIOCHEN Sexual Assault on a Child and the FIOCHEN Fost that the State failed to exercise due diligence in Pabes. For both fainted and fraudulently forged sex offenses.
CASE HISTORY
On 11/22/2010, Dallas Police Department fraudulently feged the Ratings on cause Nos. F021183 &; F0-21189, Prosecutor Brectie B. Groop Roth fraudulently feged the Inductments, on 11/24/2010 because both falsified sex offenses were never once taken before any magistrate judge or grandyury. On 11/21/2010, the State feged and falsified the arrest warrants, without any signature of a magistrate judge, and not once did any force officer come to Applicants, bame to arrest him for these cases. Also, on 11/27/2010, the District Attorney: "DISMISSED ON MOTION OF DISTECT ATTONEY," but each warrant should an arrest date as Dec. 23, 2010. These incomplete and fraudulent arrest warrants can be found in the incomplete Clerk's record, that was filed with the Court of Appeals in Dallas, on May of 2014. The State is fraudulently showing (euroy) different arrest dates for both falsified offenses.
Applicant filed a preponderance of evidence to support his claims. Applicants, ineffective and deficient defense lawyer filed the motion for new trial on 12/17/2010. On January 3, 2011, that motion for new trial was circled granted and the State violated Applicants due process to purposely falling to intern Applicant of this granted motion. Applicant was unable to argue this due process violation because the State continues not to fernward Applicant any records.
Applicant's STATEMENT OF FECTS
How and why are the files missing from both falsified offenses? The State cannot produce any Arrest Records, because there were never any arrest for them! The State cannot produce any Arragmment Page 1 of 3
*3 Information from both falsified cases because there was never any arrangements met. Texas kou requires that, for every felony offense changed, there must be first preliminary initial appearances, see Article 15, 17 date Criminal Precedute, If this is Texas kou... Then why was Dallas County able to violate it? The State will not respond to Applicants issues raised because they know that they are guilty of fraud, perjury, and falsifying government documents. Where is the Brady Material &; Discrepary from both falsified offenses? The trial files are not lost! They never existed period, Preponderance of evidence? P P If the State don't have any original trial records, records, offense reports, arrest reports et cetera... Then how would the State expect Applicant to, shew preponderance of any evidence! There are no complaint affidavits for both offenses! So, how could there be indichments! The State is violating its on laws and rules, in order to keep Applicant in prison illegally.
By the State's violation of the United States Constitution no rational juror could have found Applicant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt had the jurors known that Applicant was, never once arrested, never once arrested, never taken before a Magistrate judge, never given any opportunity to post bail, never interned of any rights to an examining trial or counselor, never read any Miranda Rights, never arraamed, never investigated by Dallas Police Dept., and never had any Court dates from both fraudulent sex cases. The State will not forward Applicant any of the documents needed, to show preponderance of evidence, because they are trying to keep covering up the proceedings of Brocke &;. Gron-Robb, and the Malondrices of Calvin D Johnson &; Lori Ordway.
The facts are in the incomplete record from cause nos. 4000183 and 4000188 , when did Applicant have a court date for these cases? What motion did ineffective lawyer Calvin D Johnson file? NOOCE! Where is the Brady Material for cause nos. 4000183 &; 4000184 ? Where are the grand July minutes for these fraudulent cases? Applicant will ask, the Federal Courts to a de novo response for these misconducts, and Applicant wants, Strick proof for the ineffective assistant of counsel as compared to Strickland.
Of course the State will claim that Applicant's application is procedurally barred and recommend its dismissal, why won't the State answer, and respond back to Applicant's issues raised? Why? So, the State is saying that it is Texas' law, for a BURK, THOUGHT man to be tried and Page
*4
ideally convicted for sexual performance by a child &; Sexual Assaulton a child, without never ane getting arrested and never getting anngared for them? The State is saying that its legal to fraudulently forged four (4) arrest dates for these cases, that never ane occurred? The State is saying that its of for the prosecution of fraudulently forged these indictments, and inlald PReands? The State is showing that it is legal to withhold all Brady Material &; Discovery? It's of for the files to be missing, and is it ok for there never being any complaint aftidutts? Is it ok for a Black Man to be illegally convicted, without beeging read any Miranda Rolds? The State, is showing that, a motion for new trial can be granted, and a BLACK MAN will not be entitled to a new trial? Even though its circled granted under ORDER!
CONCLUSION
Applicant respectfully demands an Evidentiary Hearing in an open Court before an unbiased judge. Qucte Gratle' 5 , Lewis signed these fraudulont PR bends on 12/3/2010, while Applicant was never ane in any custody for both falsified sex cases abore, the will continue to show harm and prejudice towards Applicant. Applicant's application must be granted and relief granted in the interest of true justice.
Respectfully submitted, SENPICK WILKERSON/RESEN Ramsey 2 Unit 1100 MN 6557 E-817T Rosturon, TX 77583
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
E hereby by certify that on May 15, 2015, the Rerecping document has been U.S. mailed to: Fdica, The Definict Clerk, 133 N. Rwetherd Blud, LB12, Dallas, TX 75237 &; Court &; Criminal Apeats, P.O. Box 12308, Austin, TX 78711 .
P.3.
Satequed my liberty
Page 3 of 3
*5
WRIL NON, WOB-60213-300
EX PARTE SENRUCK, WILKERSON
IN THE COURT OF ORIMINAL APPEALS IN AUSTIN, TEXAS
PROOF OF DEFENSE COUNSELDA'S DIFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE
CONTES NOU, SENRUCK, WILKERSON, the APPILORNT pro se in the slyld number above, and files this, his proof of defense counselors ineffective assistance, respectfully showing to this Court as follows:
I.
Not only was defense counsel Calvin D. Johnson ineffertive, but he also acted extremely unprofessional by allowing Applicant to be illegally tried and illegally convicted for FID-CIIES sexual performance by a Child &; FID-CIIEY, Sexual Assault on a Child, Knowing that Applicant was never once arrested and never once arranged for them. Calvin D. Johnson allowed the prosecutor Broke B. Grora-Robb, to fraudulently consolidate both tainted sex offenses, with FOD-CII'S Compelling Restitution, when the State never had any Jurisdiction for cause Nos FID-CIIEs &; FID-CIIEY due to the fact that the State failed to exercise due diligence in arresting Applicant for them. Brocke B. Grora-Robb fraudulently forged the incidents from cause Nos, FID-CIIEs &; FID-CIIEY, wherere both tainted offenses were never once presented before any magistrate judge or grandjury, there's absolutely no defense reports, no probable cause, no complaint affidavits, no sworn arrest affidavits, no accoamment information, and no first preliminary initial appearance information to support the incomplete records from cause Nos, FID-CIIEs &; FID-CIIEY.
II.
Without never once having any countaperances for cause nos, FID-CIIEs &; FID-CIIEY, on 12/13/2010, was the Wvery first time that Calvin, D. Johnson had informed Applicant that he was going to trial, And the illegal trial began on 12/14/2010, However, on 12/13/2010, Calvin Johnson tried to convince Applicant to leave the State, and to hide-out because Johnsen State that he would not win the trial, Also, on 12/13/2010, Johnsen told Applicant infront of the State's (Ms. Tern) Jennings) witness, that he would loose his law license if anyone knew that Applicant would be tried for cause Nos, FID-CIIEs &; FID-CIIEY, without being arrested and never being arranged. See Exhibit A. Page 1 of 2
*6 CONCLUSION
What defense lawyer in this country we call ‘United States of America’, would illegally force their client into a Sham trial, to be illegally convicted on two 23 sex offenses, while Knowing that there were never any arrest made, and no arrangements are met? The answer is, Dallas, Texas, in Dallas County at the Frank Crowley Court building. The defense lawyer is Calvin D. Johnson, in which the Applicant have known since 1993, while they both attended Howard Ayne University, with graduating together in 1996. The fact is simply this Calvin Johnson’s performance fall extremely below. Stickland & Washington, Calvin Johnson executed misconduct by acting extremely inappropriately in Apollonnts life and liberty, by aiding in depriving Applicant of such. Relief must be granted to Applicant because the motion for New Trial was granted on January 5, 2011, causing the State to never aquiring Jurisdiction; and the Court of Appeals should have never gone forward with the direct Appeals. Relief must be granted.
Respectfully submitted,
SENARICK WILKERSON (1885146 Ransey, L. Unit 110Q F.M. 655 7E-2-177 Rosharon, TX 77583
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on May 29, 2015, the Foregoing document has been U.S. mailed to: Court of Briminal Appeals, 20, Box 12308, Austin, Texas 78711.
SERVICK WILKERSON
AS.
Please safeguard my liberty
Page 2 of 2
*7
AFFIDAVIT
I. Terri Jennings, residing in Dallas County, do state that I am over the age of 18 years old, and am competent to state the following facts:
On December 13,2010, at Taco Bueno resturant, located on Lemmon Ave., I witnessed defense attorney Calvin D. Johnson, tell Senrick Wilkerson, that he would loose his law license if anyone found out that counselor Johnson was aware of his client being tried without being arrested, and never once arraigned for the latter two charges of, F10-01183 Sexual Performance by a Child &; F10-01184 Sexual Assault on a Child.
I also witnessed defense counselor Johnson, advise Mr. Wilkerson to leave the state and to not show up for the trial, that had began on December 14,2010. Mr. Johnson clearly stated, that he would not win the trial.
I. Terri Jennings, currently residing in Dallas County, delcare under penalty of per jury that, according to my belief, the facts stated in this documnet are true and correct.
*8 SENRICK WILKERSON 1885146 Ramsey I Unit 1100 FM 655 7E-2-17T Roshaton, Texas 77583 May 29, 2015 CLIENT-ATTORNEY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM Program Director P.O. Box 12487
Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711 RE: Record 674910 Dear Mrs. Jessica A. Bergman, I truly mean no disrespect, but I received a letter from you on Wednesday May 27,2015, that was dated May 22, 2015. Here's a quote from this letter, in the very last sentence of the second paragraph: "However, we are enclosing a list of resources that you may find helpful," "The strange thing is thus: You failed to enclose a list of resources, but this done purposely, or was this an honest mistake? You enclosed the copy of that Affidavit, that was signed by the State's witness, Ms. Terti Jennings, which provides proof of the ineffectiveness and the misconducts of defense counselor Calvin D. Johnson, lully wont you people do anything about this illegally, conspired mess that I am in because of the malicious prosecutorial misconducts and the fraudulently forged indjctment executed by prosecutor Brooke B. GrossRobb, with the unprofessionalism executed by Calvin D. Johnson. Also, are you planning to forward me that list of resources, that you mentioned in the letter from Record 674910, that was never mailed to me? Thanks in advance for your time and a very speedy response would be greatly appreciated. R.S.
Please safeguard my Liberty