| Kan. | Jan 15, 1870

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Kingman, C. J.:

The errors alleged in this case are precisely the same as those decided in the case of Wiley v. Keokuk, ante, 94, with this exception; the question as to the sufficiency of the cause of challenge of the juror does not arise in this case.

For the reasons given in that case, the judgment in this case is affirmed.

Safford, J., concurring.
© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.