Wilday v. Panas
122 N.J.L. 28
N.J.
1939
Check Treatment

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion delivered per curiam by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, WALKER, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None. *Page 34