Wilcox v. MorrowWilcox v. Morrow
Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendants’ motion to set aside the verdict pursuant to CPLR 4404 (a). "A jury verdict should not be set aside as against the weight of the evidence unless the jury could not have reached the verdict on any fair interpretation of the evidence” (Martin v Seaman,
Defendants contend that plaintiff’s counsel made improper comments during his opening statement and summation. Because neither the opening statement nor the summation was transcribed, we cannot review that contention (see, Jones v Brilar Enters.,