| N.Y. Sup. Ct. | Oct 15, 1811
This case comes within the principle laid down in Doolin v. Ward. (6 Johns. Rep. 194.) The contract was a nudum pactum, and a fraud on the vendor. The judgment below must be reversed.
Judgment reversed.
This case comes within the principle laid down in Doolin v. Ward. (6 Johns. Rep. 194.) The contract was a nudum pactum, and a fraud on the vendor. The judgment below must be reversed.
Judgment reversed.