History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wightman v. Hastings
4 Mass. 244
Mass.
1808
Check Treatment
Per Curiam,

(absente Parsons, C. J.) The words of the statute are too clear to leave a doubt. It is absurd to say that the parties may by their agreement evade a positive and very wholesome pro vision of a statute. The case is clearly within the provision, and to decide otherwise would be to make law, not to explain and administer it. The plaintiff is entitled to his costs before the appeal and the defendant is entitled to his costs since the appeal.

Case Details

Case Name: Wightman v. Hastings
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Mar 15, 1808
Citation: 4 Mass. 244
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.